<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="40952">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Gratitude versus entitlement</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Chicago</placeTerm>
   <publisher>American Marketing Association</publisher>
   <dateIssued>March 2014</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 1 - 19</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Customer prioritization strategies, which focus a firm's efforts on its &#13;
most important customers, are expected to improve account profitability.&#13;
 Anecdotal evidence suggests, however, that such strategies may also &#13;
undermine account profitability by inducing customers to become overly &#13;
demanding. Building on social exchange theory, this research evaluates &#13;
these competing perspectives across two field studies and finds that &#13;
prioritization is best understood as a double-edged sword. Specifically,&#13;
 the results reveal that prioritization efforts initiate both a &#13;
gratitude-driven process, which enhances sales and profit, and an &#13;
entitlement-driven process, which increases service costs and reduces &#13;
profit. Importantly, the findings indicate that prioritization tactics &#13;
differ in the extent to which they trigger these competing processes and&#13;
 thus in their ability to influence account profitability. Finally, the &#13;
results also reveal that critical moderators (competitive intensity and &#13;
prioritization transparency) determine the extent to which the &#13;
entitlement-driven process undermines the gratitude-driven process. For &#13;
managers, the findings suggest that both the tactics employed and &#13;
moderating conditions determine whether prioritization has a positive, &#13;
negative, or negligible effect on prioritized accounts' profitability. &#13;
[ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] &lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>40952</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-04-29 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-09-30 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>