<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="41020">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Beware the next big thing</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Chicago</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>May 2014</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 50 - 57</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Innovative management ideas that bubble up in other companies pose a &#13;
perennial quandary for leaders: Should you attempt to borrow new ideas, &#13;
and if so, which ones and how? Even the most promising practices can be &#13;
disastrous if they're transplanted into the wrong company, writes Julian&#13;
 Birkinshaw of London Business School. Broadly speaking, there are two &#13;
ways to borrow from innovative companies, he argues. The first, observe &#13;
and apply, is the most commonly used approach for adopting new &#13;
management ideas. It can and does work well, but only under limited sets&#13;
 of circumstances: when the observed practice easily stands alone or &#13;
involves just a small constellation of supporting behaviors (think of &#13;
GE's well-regarded succession-planning process) and when a company's &#13;
management model or way of thinking is very similar to the originator's &#13;
(think of two software firms that both use the Agile development &#13;
approach). The second method is to extract a management practice's &#13;
essential principle--its underlying logic--and ask a series of questions&#13;
 to determine if it is right for your firm, including: How is your &#13;
company different from the originating firm? Are the goals of the &#13;
practice important to your organization? Many management innovations are&#13;
 launched with great fanfare, only to fade in popularity. With careful &#13;
analysis, you can avoid falling prey to this hype cycle. And even if it &#13;
turns out that a borrowed idea isn't right for you, the analysis will &#13;
help you better understand your own management models and sharpen your &#13;
practices.&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>41020</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-05-12 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-05-12 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>