<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="41399">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Moving corporate boundaries</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Wheat Ridge</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher>
   <dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 12 - 26</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>The latest century has witnessed two major transformations of the &#13;
business landscape through which the boundaries of firms were modified &#13;
substantially. The first was the establishment of the large-scale &#13;
integrated hierarchies, like the Ford Motor Company, in the beginning of&#13;
 the 20th century. The second was the disintegration of these &#13;
hierarchies at the end of the same century. In both cases, the objective&#13;
 of the boundary movement was to improve the opportunities for &#13;
innovative redesign. Because the strategic approaches to achieve this &#13;
objective were quite different, the interplay between innovative &#13;
redesign and changes of the boundaries of firms deserves further &#13;
exploration. This article is based empirically on previous research on &#13;
these two types of transformations. The information from these studies &#13;
is used to formulate seven propositions concerning the interplay between&#13;
 innovative redesign and corporate boundaries. Three main findings &#13;
spring from this study. First, the boundaries of firms are multifaceted.&#13;
 In addition to the ownership boundary, it is demonstrated that &#13;
influence boundaries and awareness boundaries are central in innovative &#13;
redesign. Second, corporate boundaries are dynamic. The study shows that&#13;
 sometimes they function as buffers in relation to other firms, while in&#13;
 other situations, they serve as bridges. Third, for the individual &#13;
firm's boundary setting, two issues appear to be critical: one concerns &#13;
the trade-off between specialization and integration, and the other &#13;
relates to the interaction between the internal capabilities of the firm&#13;
 and those that are accessible from business partners. [PUBLICATION &#13;
ABSTRACT]              &lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">15232409?</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>41399</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-06-25 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-06-25 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>