<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="41458">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>How formal control influences decision-making clar</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Oxford</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Wiley-Blackwell</publisher>
   <dateIssued>May 2013</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 430 - 447</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Implementing formal planning instruments such as the stage-and-gate-type&#13;
 system ( SGS) and project management ( PM) have long been seen as the &#13;
key to new product development ( NPD) success. They create the structure&#13;
 needed for managing NPD activities, supporting coordination among &#13;
functional groups, reducing uncertainty and error, and assuring time and&#13;
 cost efficiency. But recent research presents ambiguous results, &#13;
suggesting that SGS and PM as formal controls can also have a negative &#13;
effect. Integrating ideas from three literatures-i.e., NPD management, &#13;
organization control theory, and technical control theory-the present &#13;
study assesses NPD programs in terms of three perspectives: (1) the &#13;
formal control mechanisms used for managing NPD programs-specifically &#13;
SGS, which is mainly seen as a higher organizational level approach used&#13;
 for guiding and implementing a portfolio of NPD projects, and PM, which&#13;
 is a precise formal control mechanism relevant for managing specific &#13;
problems at a single project level; (2) the immediate outcome of the &#13;
application of formal controls, i.e. decision-making clarity ( DMC); and&#13;
 (3) degree of NPD innovativeness, a key contingency hypothesized to &#13;
impact the efficacy of formal controls. For the empirical analysis, data&#13;
 are collected through a survey of 162 corporate NPD programs ( Austria &#13;
and Denmark, manufactured goods and services) where a total of 1274 &#13;
respondents provide information relevant to their position. Hierarchical&#13;
 regression analysis is used to test the relationships. Results indicate&#13;
 that the performance effect of NPD formal control is fully mediated by &#13;
DMC. Further, of the six hypothesized outcome relationships, four are &#13;
fully supported. Both SGS and PM are effective systems for managing NPD &#13;
when degree of innovativeness is not taken into account. PM, however, &#13;
loses its efficacy at higher degrees of NPD program innovativeness while&#13;
 SGS continues to work at achieving positive DMC at the radical end of &#13;
the innovativeness spectrum. Analysis of interaction effects indicates &#13;
that for more innovative NPD programs, best results are achieved when &#13;
companies implement an interactive system of both SGS and PM, where the &#13;
two systems complement each other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] &lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">07376782</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>41458</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07-03 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07-03 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>