<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="43962">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Sustainability in the boardroom</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>Jul/Aug 2014</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 86 – 94</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>One surprising role of Nike’s committee is to provide support&#13;
for innovation. More and more companies recognize the importance of corporate&#13;
responsibility to their long-term success--and yet the matter gets short shrift&#13;
in most boardrooms, consistently ranking at the bottom of some two dozen&#13;
possible priorities. Many years ago labor conditions in Asian contract&#13;
factories prompted Nike board member Jill Ker Conway to lobby for a board-level&#13;
corporate responsibility committee, which the company created in 2001. In the&#13;
years since, the committee has steadily broadened its purview, now advising on&#13;
a broad range of issues including innovation and acquisitions in addition to&#13;
labor practices and resource sustainability. A close examination of Nike’s&#13;
experience has led HBS professor Lynn S. Paine to conclude that a dedicated&#13;
board-level committee of this sort could be a valuable addition to many if not&#13;
most companies in at least five ways: as a source of knowledge and expertise,&#13;
as a sounding board and constructive critic, as a driver of accountability, as&#13;
a stimulus for innovation, and as a resource for the full board. In an&#13;
accompanying interview with Paine, Conway discusses the committee’s creation&#13;
and provides an insider’s perspective on what has made it so effective.&#13;
[ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]&#13;
&#13;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>43962</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07-17 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07-17 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>