<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="43974">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Biodiversity reporting in Denmark</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Bradford?</placeTerm>
   <publisher> Emerald Group Publishing</publisher>
   <dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 833 - 872</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Purpose - This paper aims to suggest that companies have ethical reasons&#13;
 to report about biodiversity issues and to investigate whether &#13;
companies act on these reasons by examining the extent of biodiversity &#13;
reporting in Denmark. Design/methodology/approach - For the first &#13;
purpose, desk research was conducted using consequentialist ethics, &#13;
while for the second purpose, data were gathered from the 2009-2011 &#13;
annual reports, CSR-type reports and homepages of 24 Danish large-cap &#13;
companies. Findings - Philosophically, it is shown that biodiversity &#13;
preservation and reporting is an ethical issue, even on the assumption &#13;
that biodiversity does not possess intrinsic value. Empirically, it is &#13;
shown that Danish companies score poorly overall, both quantitatively &#13;
and qualitatively, with regards to reporting on biodiversity. Research &#13;
limitations/implications - Even though the importance of biodiversity &#13;
can be justified on different assumptions, biodiversity reporting is &#13;
under-researched offering potential for future research on a globally &#13;
important issue. Practical implications - Justifying the preservation of&#13;
 biodiversity from an instrumental viewpoint might convince accounting &#13;
audiences that are sceptical of normative ethical argumentation based on&#13;
 intrinsic value. The relative lack of biodiversity reporting in Denmark&#13;
 shows the need for the State and accounting standard setters to address&#13;
 this issue together with business and other stakeholders. &#13;
Originality/value - Few studies theorize on why there is a need for &#13;
environmental reporting. Those that do are based on non-instrumental &#13;
considerations. This paper gives philosophical arguments for &#13;
biodiversity reporting normally outside the scope of accounting. It &#13;
emphasizes how even those who deny that biodiversity has intrinsic value&#13;
 are morally obliged to account for biodiversity. The argument also &#13;
provides novel reasons for why thinking about discount rates should be &#13;
governed by pure preference considerations. Empirically, this is only &#13;
the second paper examining biodiversity reporting and the first about &#13;
the Danish context. &lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">09513574?</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>43974</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07-17 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07-17 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>