<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="45444">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Who’s your most valuable salesperson?</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>April 2015</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 62 - 68</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>U.S.&#13;
businesses spend $800 billion annually on sales force compensation and another&#13;
$15 billion on sales training. Yet the backward-looking metrics they rely on&#13;
(such as revenue generated) to gauge the impact of this spending provide&#13;
limited insight into how a salesperson will do going forward and what types of training&#13;
and incentives will be most effective. As a result, many companies misallocate&#13;
sales force investments. The authors worked with data from a Fortune 500 B2B&#13;
software, hardware, and services firm to develop a method for measuring reps’&#13;
future profitability. The metric, salesperson future value (SFV), is the net&#13;
present value of future cash flows from a salesperson’s existing and&#13;
prospective customers minus the costs of developing, motivating, and retaining&#13;
the rep. The SFV analysis revealed that the firm had been overvaluing poor&#13;
performers and undervaluing stars. Using the SFV calculations and data on each&#13;
rep’s prior training and incentives, the authors segmented reps according to&#13;
whether they were motivated more by training or by various incentives. The firm&#13;
then increased training for some reps and increased incentives for others, thus&#13;
achieving an 8% increase in SFV across the sales force. The firm also increased&#13;
its investments in high-SFV reps and reduced investments in low-SFV reps—a&#13;
reallocation of resources that increased the firm’s revenue by 4%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>45444</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2015-06-11 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2015-06-11 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>