<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="45835">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>The organizational apology</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>September 2015</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 44 - 52</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>At&#13;
 some point, every company makes a mistake that requires an apology—to &#13;
an individual; a group of customers, employees, or business partners; or&#13;
 the public at large. And more often than not, companies and their &#13;
leaders&#13;
fail to apologize effectively, if at all, which can severely damage &#13;
their reputations and their relationships with stakeholders. Companies &#13;
need clearer guidelines for determining whether a mistake merits an &#13;
apology and, when it does, for crafting and delivering&#13;
an effective message. In this article, the authors present their &#13;
framework—the apology formula—to help companies navigate the tricky &#13;
terrain. Leaders should ask themselves four questions: • Was there a &#13;
violation? • Was it core to our promise or mission? • How&#13;
will the public react? • Are we committed to change? As a general rule, &#13;
the more central to the mission of the company the violation is and the &#13;
more people it affects, the more important it is that the apology be &#13;
pitch-perfect. Once a company decides that an&#13;
apology is necessary, it needs to carefully consider the who, what, &#13;
where, when, and how of executing it. For core violations, the “who” has&#13;
 to be senior leaders, the “what” has to show a tremendous commitment to&#13;
 change, the “where” has to be high profile,&#13;
the “when” has to be fast, and the “how” must be deeply sincere and &#13;
demonstrate empathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] &lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>45835</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2015-08-31 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2015-08-31 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>