<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="46475">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Find innovation where you least expect it</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>December 2015</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 82 - 89</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>When the Titanic collided with an iceberg and sunk, only 705 of its &#13;
2,200 passengers and crew, floating in 16 lifeboats, were saved. Imagine&#13;
 how many more might have lived if crew members had thought of the &#13;
iceberg as not just the cause of the disaster but a lifesaving solution.&#13;
 The iceberg rose high above the water and stretched nearly 400 feet in &#13;
length. The lifeboats, or the Titanic itself, might have been able to &#13;
pull close enough to the iceberg for people to scramble on. Regardless &#13;
of whether this could actually have worked, it’s an intriguing idea—yet &#13;
surprisingly difficult to envision. That’s because a cognitive bias &#13;
called “functional fixedness” limits people to seeing objects only in &#13;
the way in which they’re traditionally used. In a nautical context, an &#13;
iceberg is a hazard to be avoided; it’s very hard to see it any other &#13;
way. When it comes to innovation, businesses are constantly hampered by &#13;
functional fixedness and other cognitive biases that cause people to &#13;
overlook elegant solutions hidden in plain sight. We can overcome this &#13;
bias—and similar biases about an object’s design and purpose—by changing&#13;
 how we describe the object and how we think about its component parts. &#13;
This article also presents techniques and tools to help managers think &#13;
in innovative ways—a process the authors call “brainswarming”—about &#13;
common business problems, whether it be conceiving new products, finding&#13;
 novel applications for existing products, or anticipating competitive &#13;
threats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] &lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>46475</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-02-11 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-02-11 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>