<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="46525">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>The Innovative power of criticism</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>January - February 2</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 88 - 95</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Thanks to powerful ideation approaches such as design thinking and &#13;
crowdsourcing, it has become incredibly easy and relatively inexpensive &#13;
for companies to obtain a vast number of novel concepts, from both &#13;
insiders and outsiders such as customers, designers, and scientists. Yet&#13;
 many organizations still struggle to identify and seize big &#13;
opportunities. That’s because major changes in society and technology &#13;
fundamentally challenge the conventional understanding of what is &#13;
valuable, rendering obsolete whatever criteria companies are using to &#13;
identify customer problems they could address. To see which ideas truly &#13;
have potential, managers need new assessment criteria. From studying and&#13;
 working with 24 companies that have succeeded in capturing big &#13;
opportunities, the author has devised a process to create such &#13;
criteria—one that is rooted not in the art of ideation but in the art of&#13;
 criticism. It engages a company’s own employees and helps them &#13;
articulate their individual visions. These are then compared and &#13;
discussed, first in pairs and later in a group, in order to distill them&#13;
 into a handful of even better proposals. The views of outsiders are &#13;
sought only at the end. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] &lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>46525</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-02-17 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-02-17 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>