<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="46679">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Branding in the age of social media</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>March 2016</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 40 - 50</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Social media was supposed to usher in a golden age of branding. But &#13;
things didn’t turn out that way. Marketers originally thought that &#13;
Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter would let them bypass mainstream media &#13;
and connect directly with customers. Hoping to attract huge audiences to&#13;
 their brands, they spent billions producing their own creative content.&#13;
 But consumers never showed up. In fact, social media seems to have made&#13;
 brands less significant. What happened? The issue is, social media has &#13;
transformed how culture works, in a way that weakens certain branding &#13;
techniques. It has united once-isolated communities into influential &#13;
crowdcultures. Crowdcultures are very prolific cultural innovators. &#13;
Their members produce their own content—so well that companies simply &#13;
can’t compete. Consider that people making videos in their living rooms &#13;
top the charts on YouTube, which few companies have managed to crack. &#13;
While they diminish the impact of branded content, crowdcultures grease &#13;
the wheels for an alternative approach, cultural branding. In it, a &#13;
brand sets itself apart by promoting a new ideology that springs from &#13;
the crowd. Chipotle did this successfully when it made two short films &#13;
critiquing industrial food, tapping into a movement that began in the &#13;
organic-farming subculture and blew up into a mainstream concern on &#13;
social media. Other good examples come from personal care. Axe revived &#13;
its brand by becoming an over-the-top cheerleader for the “lad” crowd &#13;
that arose as a response to politically correct gender politics. Dove &#13;
championed the other side of the divide, with campaigns that spoke to &#13;
crowdculture concerns about unhealthy beauty standards for women. Brands&#13;
 succeed when they break through in culture, and crowdcultures are a &#13;
great vehicle for doing that. But firms can’t identify the critical &#13;
opportunities by relying on traditional segmentation and trend reports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>46679</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-03-17 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-03-17 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>