<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="46683">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>The Other disruption</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>March 2016</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 78 - 84</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Most managers are well versed in the defensive playbook for confronting &#13;
disruptive innovation. Most commonly, they either acquire the new &#13;
entrants or “disrupt themselves” by setting up autonomous units charged &#13;
with developing their own new technology that can be rolled into their &#13;
principal operations once the disruptive innovation begins to dominate &#13;
the industry. But quite often, adopting a new technology requires &#13;
companies to fundamentally change their mainstream operations—the way &#13;
they manufacture and distribute their products. In these cases where the&#13;
 organizational model changes along with customer expectations and &#13;
preferences, the playbook often falls short. In this article Joshua Gans&#13;
 of the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management identifies &#13;
three prescriptions for surviving “supply side” disruption: Companies &#13;
must have an integrated organizational model, ownership of a product &#13;
feature important to the end customer, and a broad and flexible sense of&#13;
 corporate identity. Though less commonly understood, supply-side &#13;
disruption is arguably more dangerous than the kind described by Clayton&#13;
 Christensen in The Innovator’s Dilemma; indeed, disruption of a &#13;
product’s architecture threatens a company’s very survival in a way that&#13;
 changes in customer demands do not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>46683</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-03-17 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-03-17 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>