<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="46794">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Spontaneous deregulation</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>April 2016</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 80 - 87</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Platform businesses such as Airbnb and Uber have risen to success partly&#13;
 by sidestepping laws and regulations that encumber their traditional &#13;
competitors. Such rule flouting is what the authors call “spontaneous &#13;
private deregulation,” and it’s happening in a growing number of &#13;
industries. The authors explain that businesses are most vulnerable to &#13;
spontaneous deregulation when certain conditions hold. One, for example,&#13;
 is when regulations are excessive or outdated, protecting consumers &#13;
against unlikely risks—and when platform providers offer other means of &#13;
shielding consumers from harm. Incumbents facing threats from private &#13;
deregulation can respond by taking legal action to press for enforcement&#13;
 of existing laws. Alternatively, they can embrace aspects of a new &#13;
entrant’s approach—taxi operators, for example, have developed &#13;
Uber-style apps for ordering rides. Incumbents can also leverage their &#13;
own strengths to set themselves apart from upstart competitors—that’s &#13;
the tactic that CitizenM, the Pod Hotel, and Yotel are using to woo &#13;
guests who might otherwise book with Airbnb. If all else fails, &#13;
incumbents may have to cease operation. But they stand a good chance of &#13;
avoiding that fate if they address their vulnerabilities early. &#13;
[ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>46794</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-04-11 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-04-11 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>