<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="47502">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>The Secrets of great CEO selection</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>December 2016</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 52 - 59</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>When it comes to selecting a new CEO, judgment really matters. The &#13;
choice may devastate a company or create enormous value. In his work &#13;
advising companies, Charan has observed that some board members are &#13;
especially great at succession decisions. In this article he describes &#13;
how they go about picking the right candidate. Directors who excel at &#13;
selection zero in on the two or three distinct capabilities that a CEO &#13;
will need to thrive at the firm in question. (Charan calls this the &#13;
“pivot” because the succession decision turns on it.) For example, when &#13;
IBM was conducting a CEO search in 1993, many thought it should hire a &#13;
technologist, but two directors saw that what the company really needed &#13;
was an executive with business acumen, a customer orientation, and &#13;
execution skills. At their urging, the board brought in Lou Gerstner, &#13;
who quickly turned IBM’s $8 billion loss into a $3 billion profit. &#13;
Astute directors also keep an open mind about where the best candidate &#13;
will come from; they shed assumptions about insiders and outsiders and &#13;
may even consider a leader a few levels below the CEO. They go deep to &#13;
understand which person is the best fit with the pivot, doing their own &#13;
due diligence. Finally, they allow for the imperfections in the chosen &#13;
candidate, figuring out which gaps can be filled by other executives or &#13;
corrected with coaching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>47502</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2017-05-29 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2017-05-29 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>