<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="47620">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Customer loyalty is overrated</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Harvard Business School Publications</publisher>
   <dateIssued>January/February 201</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd"></form>
  <extent>p. 45 - 54</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Why do companies routinely succumb to the lure of rebranding? The &#13;
answer, say A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin, the authors of “Customer &#13;
Loyalty Is Overrated,” is rooted in serious misperceptions about the &#13;
nature of competitive advantage—namely, that companies need to &#13;
continually update their business models, strategies, and communications&#13;
 to respond to the explosion of options that sophisticated consumers &#13;
face. Research suggests that what makes competitive advantage truly &#13;
sustainable is helping consumers avoid having to make a choice. They &#13;
choose the leading product in the market primarily because that is the &#13;
easiest thing to do. And each time they select it, its advantage &#13;
increases over that of the products or services they didn’t choose, &#13;
creating what the authors call cumulative advantage. Lafley and Martin &#13;
offer guidance for building cumulative advantage: Become popular early. &#13;
Back in 1946, Procter &amp;amp; Gamble gave away a box of Tide with every &#13;
washing machine sold in America. Design for habit. When P&amp;amp;G&#13;
 introduced Febreze, consumers liked it but didn’t use it much. The &#13;
problem, it turned out, was that the product came in what looked like a &#13;
glass-cleaner bottle, so users kept it under the sink. When the company &#13;
redesigned the bottle so that customers would keep it in a more visible &#13;
spot, they ended up using it more often. Innovate inside the brand. &#13;
Efforts to “relaunch” brands can lead people to break their habits. &#13;
Changes in product features should be introduced in a way that retains &#13;
cumulative advantage. For customers, “improved” is much more comfortable&#13;
 than “new.” Keep communication simple. A clever ad may win awards, but &#13;
if its message is too complex, it will backfire. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification></classification>
 <identifier type="isbn">00178012</identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan - Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM Pusat Informasi Manajemen</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>47620</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2017-08-07 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2017-08-07 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>